Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(53,771 posts)
1. Not that shocking IMO, save for if you're as delusional as TSF.
Fri Nov 14, 2025, 07:12 PM
Friday

Boebert is as transaction as Trump.

And in the privacy of the War Room, TSF requested (maybe demanded) that she change her Epstein vote. The very next words out of her mouth were "What's in it for me?"

And Trump told her nothing. She would get nothing. But he expected her to change her vote.

At this point in her political career, two things might have influenced Boebert to change her vote:
a) Money, property, stocks, etc.
or
b) A viable threat on her safety and/or life.

Option A out of the picture.
Option B was possible but not likely.

Trump couldn't "fire" her.

So she left with status quo.

If TSF were shocked, it's because his delusion of veiled threats and/or promises of enhanced wealth aren't working anymore.

Boebert can see that he's a lame duck and his time is limited.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»Lauren Boebert's Shocking...»Reply #1