Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cirsium

(2,768 posts)
26. Sure
Thu May 1, 2025, 03:39 PM
May 2025

That reminds me of President Lincoln when he pointed out the probable collusion between Buchanan (the White House), Douglass (the Senate opposition leader) and Taney (the Supreme Court Chief Justice).

Let any one who doubts, carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination -- piece of machinery so to speak -- compounded of the Nebraska doctrine, and the Dred Scott decision. Let him consider not only what work the machinery is adapted to do, and how well adapted; but also, let him study the history of its construction, and trace, if he can, or rather fail, if he can, to trace the evidence of design and concert of action, among its chief architects, from the beginning.
...

We cannot absolutely know that all these exact adaptations are the result of preconcert. But when we see a lot of framed timbers, different potions of which we know have been gotten out at different times and places and by different workmen,- Stephen, Franklin, Roger and James, for instance-and we see these timbers joined together, and see they exactly make the frame of a house or a mill, all the tenons and mortieses exactly fitting, and all the lengths and proportions of the different pieces exactly adapted to their respective places, and not a piece too many or too few-not omitting even scaffolding-or, if a single piece be lacking, we see the place in the frame exactly fitted and prepared to yet bring such piece in-in such a case, we find it impossible not to believe that Stephen and Franklin and Roger and James all understood one another from the beginning, and all worked upon a common plan or draft drawn up before the first lick was struck.

https://www.nps.gov/liho/learn/historyculture/housedivided.htm


Stephen Douglas: If any one man choose to enslave another, no third man shall be allowed to object.

James Buchanan: Whether the people can constitutionally exclude slavery from their limits is a question for the Supreme Court.

Roger Taney: African Americans "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect."

If there wasn't a corrupt bargain, there may as well have been.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Come on Supreme Court kacekwl May 2025 #1
They need a case melm00se May 2025 #6
If the supreme court really cared, markodochartaigh May 2025 #11
No. ShazzieB May 2025 #14
One of the litigants made up markodochartaigh May 2025 #18
This is true. ShazzieB May 2025 #20
It's the far right that arranges to brakester May 2025 #28
Sure Cirsium May 2025 #26
They don't have to kacekwl May 2025 #22
The law and order party. Ha Ha Ha republianmushroom May 2025 #2
That gave us a 34 convictions felon RainCaster May 2025 #30
Republicans have mentioned the answer.... take away the citizenship. Norrrm May 2025 #3
This is fodder JustAnotherGen May 2025 #4
These people are traitors to our country and our democracy. Deporting CITIZENS? Citizens get their day in court (as Martin68 May 2025 #5
Part of the issue is citizen children of undocumented. erodriguez May 2025 #7
No. We don't need a provision to remove 1WorldHope May 2025 #9
So if the law says you can't send them with their parents are reported, erodriguez May 2025 #15
Bingo! 1WorldHope May 2025 #23
There is. murielm99 May 2025 #10
I guess it's official: MLWR May 2025 #8
neither can we. It's sickening and inhumane. Evolve Dammit May 2025 #12
Well, you can imagine how we feel here! ananda May 2025 #13
Full on Iamscrewed May 2025 #16
History will not be kind to these tiny, cruel men. Magoo48 May 2025 #17
I just heard about this. Sickening to the extreme. Repubs have hit a new low, amazingly. LymphocyteLover May 2025 #19
As if we needed another reason... GiqueCee May 2025 #21
As far as they are concerned, there are only 1100 or so 'Americans' in this country. OldBaldy1701E May 2025 #32
Remember their names and hold them accountable Mysterian May 2025 #24
Deport everyone who voted against it. Wonder Why May 2025 #25
It's a matter for the courts. Not a whimsical GOP Congress. /nt bucolic_frolic May 2025 #27
Unfortunately... Godot51 May 2025 #29
There is no such thing as "deporting" citizens. HappyLarge May 2025 #31
Never forget how they voted. They have violated their oaths. surfered May 2025 #33
IOW voting to ignore the cours and the Constitution azureblue May 2025 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Republicans Vote Against ...»Reply #26