Latest Breaking News

GiqueCee

(2,570 posts)

44. The critical point that seems to be shouted down in all this...

Sat Apr 19, 2025, 12:33 PM

Apr 2025

Last edited Mon Apr 21, 2025, 07:10 AM - Edit history (1)

... is that Mahmoud was never advocating for Hamas, he was speaking in defense of the Palestinian people being systematically victimized by Netanyahu's brutal policies. It is wrong to conflate being Palestinian with being a Hamas sympathizer, and equally wrong to say that criticizing Netanyahu's actions is antisemitic. It is not. It is simply anti-Netanyahu. There are millions of Israelis that abhor what Netanyahu is doing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US judge rules Mahmoud Khalil can be deported for his views [View all] BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 OP

APPEAL ! ! ! no_hypocrisy Apr 2025 #1

He'll probably lose. Igel Apr 2025 #17

No free speech for non-citizens. But soon that will apply to citizens as well. surfered Apr 2025 #2

Cry HAVOC... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #3

Have to add the video BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #22

I paraphrased Marc Antony's words from Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar"... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #43

I have ideas markie Apr 2025 #4

There's a separate, coincident case going on in New Jersey, so he can't actually be deported yet... Native Apr 2025 #5

How come there is a second trial? question everything Apr 2025 #29

Here ya go... Native Apr 2025 #39

This is pretty insane. Balatro Apr 2025 #6

Nazi judge. Basso8vb Apr 2025 #7

No reason to deploy that epithet maxsolomon Apr 2025 #12

Are you OK with this? Cirsium Apr 2025 #25

I'm ok with the decision if she believes she's following the law Polybius Apr 2025 #28

As if that ever means anything. Cirsium Apr 2025 #31

I'm am not a lawyer Polybius Apr 2025 #32

Your opinion, of course Cirsium Apr 2025 #34

My opinion is rather complicated Polybius Apr 2025 #36

Stupid to protest? Cirsium Apr 2025 #38

I didn't say that I support Rubio's actions Polybius Apr 2025 #40

I guess Cirsium Apr 2025 #41

The critical point that seems to be shouted down in all this... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #44

The Judge's decision? If that aligns with the law, then yes. maxsolomon Apr 2025 #42

Appointed in January 2023 by the US Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review Polybius Apr 2025 #18

Are you OK with it? Cirsium Apr 2025 #26

My heart breaks Scubamatt Apr 2025 #8

So it boils down to this judge blessing the notion moniss Apr 2025 #9

Sounds to me as if slightlv Apr 2025 #10

Immigration courts are article 1 courts. Nonnia Bisnez Apr 2025 #11

Article II Judges & Courts. Part of the DOJ, specifically the Executive Office for Immigration Review n/t 24601 Apr 2025 #16

'Pawns': Critics blast 'fake' judge who ruled Trump can deport Columbia activist LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #13

Trump's fascist state is complete iemanja Apr 2025 #14

Fascism's darkness has fallen on this country. sinkingfeeling Apr 2025 #15

Unless and until the SCOTUS overrules Judge Jamee Comans, we are all Mahmoud Khalil now. ancianita Apr 2025 #19

That judge is one of the so-called "Article II" (administrative) judges BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #20

Hizzonner Comans... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #21

"Hurronner" Comans. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2025 #23

Thanks for the correction... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #24

Dunno about Wavy Gravy, he said a lot of wise and thoughtful stuff. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2025 #33

HA! GiqueCee Apr 2025 #35

Like I said: Late sixties. I think '71 was still in the late sixties, it's all a bit blurry. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2025 #37

I don't understand how this can be either legal or constitutional. Martin68 Apr 2025 #27

Once all the appeals are exhausted, will he be allowed to leave on his own accord? question everything Apr 2025 #30