Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(167,409 posts)
13. 'Pawns': Critics blast 'fake' judge who ruled Trump can deport Columbia activist
Fri Apr 11, 2025, 06:18 PM
Apr 2025

The "judge" who issued this order is an immigration "judge" who was appointed by trump after trump purged all competent immigration judge. This judge is doing what he was ordered to do by trump and knows that if he rules against trump on this or any other issue, he will be removed.

This ruling will be appealed to a real judge who is not controlled by trump.

‘Pawns’: Critics blast 'fake' judge who ruled Trump can deport Columbia activist https://twp.ai/4imR4c

Tuck The Frumpers (@realtuckfrumper.bsky.social) 2025-04-11T21:41:23.000Z



https://www.rawstory.com/mahmoud-khalil-2671753774/

A federal immigration judge’s ruling on Friday that allowed the Trump administration to move forward with the deportation of former Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil was roundly criticized by legal observers stunned by the decision.

The ruling greenlighting the deportation of the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident came at the end of a hearing in Louisiana as Immigration Judge Jamee E. Comans concluded that the government “established by clear and convincing evidence that he is removable,” according to The Associated Press.

But not all were swayed by the judge’s legal reading of the case, which marked the first in a string of arrests at universities nationwide of students living in the U.S. as permanent residents in an escalation of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown......

“The fake judge (a DOJ Immigration Judge) ruled this, and he is only empowered to interpret immigration law, not the Constitution,” Cato Institute immigration expert David Bier wrote on X.

Civil rights attorney Scott Hechinger told his own X followers that it was “really critical to understand 2 things about the Mahmoud Khalil ruling.”

“1. Immigration judges are *not nominated & confirmed.* They are political appointees of the Executive. 2. Trump purged all immigration judges he didn’t like at the outset of his admin. They’re all pawns,” he said.

This ruling will be appealed

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

APPEAL ! ! ! no_hypocrisy Apr 2025 #1
He'll probably lose. Igel Apr 2025 #17
No free speech for non-citizens. But soon that will apply to citizens as well. surfered Apr 2025 #2
Cry HAVOC... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #3
Have to add the video BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #22
I paraphrased Marc Antony's words from Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar"... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #43
I have ideas markie Apr 2025 #4
There's a separate, coincident case going on in New Jersey, so he can't actually be deported yet... Native Apr 2025 #5
How come there is a second trial? question everything Apr 2025 #29
Here ya go... Native Apr 2025 #39
This is pretty insane. Balatro Apr 2025 #6
Nazi judge. Basso8vb Apr 2025 #7
No reason to deploy that epithet maxsolomon Apr 2025 #12
Are you OK with this? Cirsium Apr 2025 #25
I'm ok with the decision if she believes she's following the law Polybius Apr 2025 #28
As if that ever means anything. Cirsium Apr 2025 #31
I'm am not a lawyer Polybius Apr 2025 #32
Your opinion, of course Cirsium Apr 2025 #34
My opinion is rather complicated Polybius Apr 2025 #36
Stupid to protest? Cirsium Apr 2025 #38
I didn't say that I support Rubio's actions Polybius Apr 2025 #40
I guess Cirsium Apr 2025 #41
The critical point that seems to be shouted down in all this... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #44
The Judge's decision? If that aligns with the law, then yes. maxsolomon Apr 2025 #42
Appointed in January 2023 by the US Department of Justice's Executive Office for Immigration Review Polybius Apr 2025 #18
Are you OK with it? Cirsium Apr 2025 #26
My heart breaks Scubamatt Apr 2025 #8
So it boils down to this judge blessing the notion moniss Apr 2025 #9
Sounds to me as if slightlv Apr 2025 #10
Immigration courts are article 1 courts. Nonnia Bisnez Apr 2025 #11
Article II Judges & Courts. Part of the DOJ, specifically the Executive Office for Immigration Review n/t 24601 Apr 2025 #16
'Pawns': Critics blast 'fake' judge who ruled Trump can deport Columbia activist LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #13
Trump's fascist state is complete iemanja Apr 2025 #14
Fascism's darkness has fallen on this country. sinkingfeeling Apr 2025 #15
Unless and until the SCOTUS overrules Judge Jamee Comans, we are all Mahmoud Khalil now. ancianita Apr 2025 #19
That judge is one of the so-called "Article II" (administrative) judges BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #20
Hizzonner Comans... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #21
"Hurronner" Comans. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2025 #23
Thanks for the correction... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #24
Dunno about Wavy Gravy, he said a lot of wise and thoughtful stuff. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2025 #33
HA! GiqueCee Apr 2025 #35
Like I said: Late sixties. I think '71 was still in the late sixties, it's all a bit blurry. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2025 #37
I don't understand how this can be either legal or constitutional. Martin68 Apr 2025 #27
Once all the appeals are exhausted, will he be allowed to leave on his own accord? question everything Apr 2025 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US judge rules Mahmoud Kh...»Reply #13