Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Statin question: If the Senators have access to the best health care, why wasn't Lindsey getting care [View all]
for his heart condition? Hardening of the arteries doesn't just happen over night.
I'm asking because I keep seeing ads that claim that statins do not clear out arteries, which begs the question, why use them at all, then?
So, I'm a bit confused why a Senator would allow a heart condition to go untreated, and if it was treated, what was he taking that evidently, didn't work?
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Statin question: If the Senators have access to the best health care, why wasn't Lindsey getting care [View all]
Baitball Blogger
Sunday
OP
This. Most Americans his age have some hardening of the arteries due to time, but there is not always a way to
artemisia1
23 hrs ago
#28
Some people choose not to follow the advice of their doctors, and they also refuse to take medicines.
Solly Mack
Sunday
#2
He could have had an undiagnosed aortic aneurysm. Aortic dissection can happen to anyone.
Solly Mack
Sunday
#12
Just seems there would have been warnings if he had been seeing a doctor regularly.
Baitball Blogger
Sunday
#6
Just because a person has good healthcare doesn't mean they follow the recommendations they get, or can defeat genetics
WhiskeyGrinder
Sunday
#16
It is because sta tins are cheaper to produce (profits you know are more important than people)
Stargazer99
Sunday
#21