Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,920 posts)
15. Is it really?
Wed Jun 10, 2026, 02:45 PM
Wednesday

How much "news" do you read on the site formerly known as twitter that is directly actionable by YOU in that it inspires you to think in entire essays and not just repost it elsewhere like an automaton.

All these sites are noise that I block out of my life. This includes bluesky which seems quite popular here.

I get more than enough clever quips and random facts (which may be true or not) from friends or family. Memes don't interest me at all.

DU itself, which is my only "social media," is often too noisy for me. I don't click on posts that are likely to be naked links to other social media sites. When I do by some accident it irritates me. I put people who do this frequently on my ignore list.

I think it's a very serious problem in our society that so many people are lost in the noise, never able to focus in on any single issue long enough to be a force for any meaningful progress.

Smart phones are a large part of the problem. You can't really see where you are or where you are going if your eyes are glued to a smart phone. That's one reason I hope I'm never forced to own one.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No argument here. marble falls Wednesday #1
It's still a useful source of real-time info. RandySF Wednesday #2
That's about the same as... 2naSalit Wednesday #4
No, I read Playboy for the pictures. RandySF Wednesday #7
1936 : I read Der Sturmer for the classified ads DBoon Thursday #30
then people should transcribe the info instead of linking. uncle ray Wednesday #11
Is it really? hunter Wednesday #15
Social media content is utterly disposable Sympthsical Thursday #25
Agree. MorbidButterflyTat Wednesday #17
Right there with you! 2naSalit Wednesday #3
I put people on ignore who regularly post X content. Even the people I really like. demmiblue Wednesday #8
My go to line for all things... 2naSalit Wednesday #12
People love clout more than they hate fascism Prairie Gates Wednesday #5
I don't get racist, far right content on X n/t leftstreet Wednesday #6
Same here and I have had a Twitter account since I was 12yo, in early 2009. Celerity Wednesday #9
Exactly leftstreet Wednesday #10
This made me think of you MorbidButterflyTat Wednesday #18
he is a good pope, thanks for sharing Celerity Wednesday #20
Your membership still props up his ability to generate ad revenue. meadowlander Wednesday #14
Same goes for msm. ananda Wednesday #13
Like drug addiction orthoclad Wednesday #16
X is indispensable for freedom of speech gulliver Wednesday #19
Well said jmbar2 Thursday #27
+1 leftstreet Thursday #28
According to some of the posters here they rarely see the ugly in their feed. hunter Thursday #32
"Never argue with people who John Brown would have shot." BlueTsunami2018 Wednesday #21
I'm on it because of my job EnergizedLib Wednesday #22
They don't want to lose all their followers if applegrove Thursday #23
Hegseth says Europe faces 'invasion' of dangerous ideologies IcyPeas Thursday #24
My algos are trained to give me useful information from trusted folks, including a lot of progressives jmbar2 Thursday #26
A couple months before Doge struck I questioned Tbear Thursday #29
Wrong, IMHO. Every elected Democrat posts from an official account on Twitter as well as numeous Passages Thursday #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»X is a viciously racist f...»Reply #15