Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Melon

(1,827 posts)

1. I ....dont think it's very transparent and it is really slow.

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Tue Jun 9, 2026, 06:16 PM

Tuesday

Honestly.
It’s not the 70’s. We have computers and such and can automate anything. I am not understanding how it takes weeks to count votes and that seems acceptable. It should be automated. All of the states. And then easily audited if required once again digitally. I’m all for the results at the end of this thing, but this isn’t Nobel prize processes. It’s counting votes and taking a month to do it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Raine

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

They don't hate California elections because they are slow or bad.... [View all] kentuck Tuesday OP

I ....dont think it's very transparent and it is really slow. Melon Tuesday #1

It is my understanding that they check every signature for match... kentuck Tuesday #2

I'm saying outside of trumps craziness Melon Tuesday #3

Yes, it is slow. kentuck Tuesday #4