Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(114,659 posts)
14. Yes, he was a very valuable voice to getting out the youth vote.
Thu Sep 11, 2025, 11:30 AM
Thursday

However, he had already made known his position that the Epstein files should all be made public, before he agreed to Trump's request to not talk about it anymore. His position was already known by his listeners.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You know who Horst Wessel was? Just_Vote_Dem Thursday #1
He was a martyr for the Nazis... kentuck Thursday #6
Yes, I fear they are following the Nazi playbook n/t Just_Vote_Dem Thursday #8
Humankind will benefit. pwb Thursday #2
One of the extremists is silenced Marthe48 Thursday #3
Could be as simple as another incel looking for their 15 minutes. Or it could be more sinister. Silent Type Thursday #4
DFT, for one EYESORE 9001 Thursday #5
Charlie Kirk Backtracks on Epstein After Presidential Call Celerity Thursday #7
Did he backtrack again in his more recent comments? kentuck Thursday #10
not that I am aware of Celerity Thursday #12
Perhaps TFG had already issued the 'contract' for assassination EYESORE 9001 Thursday #11
Kirk bent the knee immediately after Trump called him. Celerity Thursday #13
Yes, he was a very valuable voice to getting out the youth vote. kentuck Thursday #14
He was also aging out and becoming less relatable. haele Thursday #25
the far older Joe Rogan (58) and Jordan Peterson (63) are massively popular with young RWers, especially the male ones Celerity Thursday #28
he may have been a factor in 2028 rampartd Thursday #9
Who would benefit from Kirks death? Good question. Is it possible that he had some personal enemies mitch96 Thursday #15
Wouldn't the obvious answer be people who hated what he stood for? EdmondDantes_ Thursday #16
I was surprised at the size of the crowd. kentuck Thursday #17
That would be the obvious answer (and using Occam's Razor the correct one) pcdb Thursday #18
That is not an 'obvious' answer GenThePerservering Thursday #30
It does not follow Torchlight Thursday #20
The greater likelihood, IMO, is the people who are turning him into a martyr and an excuse to carry out purges Crunchy Frog Thursday #22
The obvious answer is always the correct one.. Permanut Thursday #29
His wife and kids? hunter Thursday #19
I was just about to post that. GoCubsGo Thursday #24
Who do you think is benefitting? This is like Stalin's murder of Kirov. Crunchy Frog Thursday #21
I think it may have been an "opportunity" killing... kentuck Thursday #23
Nick Fuentes and/or his fans, for example. RockRaven Thursday #26
"Where there is a dead body. . ." DinahMoeHum Thursday #27
Putin, for one CanonRay Thursday #31
DONALD TRUMP. Xoan Thursday #32
Trump. 58Sunliner Thursday #33
These responses are so typical iemanja Thursday #34
Donald Trump Emile Thursday #35
Honestly, the MAGAs benefit Buckeyeblue Thursday #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who would stand to benefi...»Reply #14