Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Israel committing genocide in Gaza, world's top scholars on the crime say [View all]lapucelle
(20,649 posts)14. Whistleblower reveals corruption of IAGS standards and practices in a rush to pass its anti-Israel genocide resolution.
In the rush to vilify Israel, genocide scholars ignored the truth
This week, [21.6%] the International Association of Genocide Scholars passed a resolution stating Israel is committing genocide in Gaza
Under normal circumstances, [genocide scholar Dr. Sara] Brown said, any member can propose a resolution, which goes before a committee for comments and feedback. Controversial or high-stakes resolutions are brought before a virtual town hall to discuss the text. This time, when the resolution was proposed on an IAGS listserv, Brown said that she and others attempted to publish a dissent that was deleted by the moderators.
One of the executive board members who moderates the listserv refused to publish it and said they are going to have a town hall, Brown recalled. Weeks passed as we waited for the town hall I reached out to ask the president of the executive board when it would happen, and was told we dont have to hold one and were not going to.'
In addition, Brown said, the resolution was posted anonymously, and the executive board refused to reveal its authorship, an unusual move that raised red flags.
Its very telling about the biases and agenda of the leadership that they refused to host a town hall There is no interest in having a transparent dialog and debate about such an important and damning [resolution] in terms of the reputation of the IAGS, Brown said.
This week, [21.6%] the International Association of Genocide Scholars passed a resolution stating Israel is committing genocide in Gaza
Under normal circumstances, [genocide scholar Dr. Sara] Brown said, any member can propose a resolution, which goes before a committee for comments and feedback. Controversial or high-stakes resolutions are brought before a virtual town hall to discuss the text. This time, when the resolution was proposed on an IAGS listserv, Brown said that she and others attempted to publish a dissent that was deleted by the moderators.
One of the executive board members who moderates the listserv refused to publish it and said they are going to have a town hall, Brown recalled. Weeks passed as we waited for the town hall I reached out to ask the president of the executive board when it would happen, and was told we dont have to hold one and were not going to.'
In addition, Brown said, the resolution was posted anonymously, and the executive board refused to reveal its authorship, an unusual move that raised red flags.
Its very telling about the biases and agenda of the leadership that they refused to host a town hall There is no interest in having a transparent dialog and debate about such an important and damning [resolution] in terms of the reputation of the IAGS, Brown said.
https://jewishinsider.com/2025/09/international-association-of-genocide-scholars-resolution-israel-sara-brown/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"86% of the members who voted" was the tip off.
Out of 500 members, 126 voted. In other words, 25.2% of the members voted for the anonymous resolution distributed through a listserv. 109 of the those who voted wanted the resolution passed.
In other words, 21.8% (not 86%) of the IAGS members voted in favor of the resolution vilifying Israel. And due to its "you too can be a genocide scholar if you pay us $30" policy, 20% of the IAGS members are currently located in Iran. That information was available to journalists at the time that the story about the scam resolution broke.
However, IAGS has deleted its twitter account and closed down access to its membership list in an effort at damage control concerning the scam resolution that 74.8% of the IAGS members did not vote for.
---------------------------------------------------
The Guardian (and any other media outlet) that fell for this scam without doing even the most research should be ashamed.
Rage baiting clicks is a great way for the MSM to raise revenue, but a downright disgusting abrogation of journalistic duty.

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Israel committing genocide in Gaza, world's top scholars on the crime say [View all]
Uncle Joe
Monday
OP
Democrats (77 - 11 percent) and independents (51 - 34 percent) think Israel is committing genocide,
Ping Tung
Tuesday
#6
Whistleblower reveals corruption of IAGS standards and practices in a rush to pass its anti-Israel genocide resolution.
lapucelle
23 hrs ago
#14
I would agree with some of what you post but the entity most responsible for any
Uncle Joe
20 hrs ago
#15
Like I've had to say twice already, "Quick, look over here!" does not work on me.
lapucelle
20 hrs ago
#17
I was addressing your post. You're the one that brought up "journalistic integrity" without mentioning that Netanyahu,
Uncle Joe
20 hrs ago
#18
Your post # 14 also blames the media without addressing Netanyahu's role in this.
Uncle Joe
19 hrs ago
#20
Now that the truth is known about the anonymous resolution passed by a mere 21.8% of IAGS members,
lapucelle
17 hrs ago
#24
No. Here is the response from the IAGS to Brown's failed attempt to delegitimise the resolution:
Celerity
16 hrs ago
#26