Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jmowreader

(52,648 posts)

13. What was on this sandwich?

Reply to struggle4progress (Original post)

Sun Aug 31, 2025, 10:00 PM

Aug 31

Maybe the reason the prosecutor couldn't get an indictment was the sandwich contained no ham.

Or the case was stupid.

Or the prosecutor isn't any good.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal prosecutor can't indict ham sandwich thrower [View all] struggle4progress Aug 27 OP

I want to thank the citizens on that grand jury for taking their public duty seriously questionseverything Aug 27 #1

Is it because it's ham? Turbineguy Aug 27 #2

A DC grand jury declined to indict sandwich guy! LetMyPeopleVote Aug 27 #3

Grand jury declines to indict man who threw a sandwich at federal officer in D.C. LetMyPeopleVote Aug 27 #4

They'll still charge him with a misdemeanor madville Aug 27 #9

Recommended. H2O Man Aug 27 #5

K&R UTUSN Aug 27 #6

What's the usual penalty John Farmer Aug 27 #7

Having you watch your target eat your lunch jmowreader Aug 31 #12

Fragile ass snowflakes are scared of a sandwich. Emile Aug 27 #8

Deadline: Legal Blog-Grand jury rejects yet another felony indictment in Trump's D.C. crackdown LetMyPeopleVote Aug 31 #10

The most unkindest cuts of all. Swede Aug 31 #11

What was on this sandwich? jmowreader Aug 31 #13