Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ificandream

(11,145 posts)

18. If anything, I think some of these discussions are more ageism than anything else

Reply to karynnj (Reply #11)

Sun May 25, 2025, 10:39 AM

Sunday

Last edited Sun May 25, 2025, 11:59 AM - Edit history (1)

That’s not to say that, as I’ve said earlier, that things haven’t changed with Biden. But we never had these kind of discussions with Queen Elizabeth. I think perhaps maybe some ignorance is in the mix here. The real question is whether Joe Biden was still able to lead the country. The answer to that is easy: yes he was. And as we can see from the first few months of his presidency, Trump is definitely not.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My thoughts on Jake Tapper and the efforts to "expose" Joe Biden. [View all] ificandream Friday OP

I think Tapper's in it for himself. Which isn't an uncommon thing per se. Tommy Carcetti Friday #1

Painful truth is there would have been no book had President Biden announced he wasn't running. Silent Type Friday #2

Bless your idealistic heart, but there absolutely would have been. W_HAMILTON Friday #4

What do you think it would have been about? Silent Type Friday #6

Uhh, the exact same thing it's about now. W_HAMILTON Friday #8

We might have had a chance to actually win, therefore no need for a book on Biden other than praise. Silent Type Friday #9

No Rebl2 Sunday #19

Stop trying to normalize Jake the Snake Sewa Friday #3

He's not. ificandream Friday #5

The only thing Tapper is pushing for is his own ego and fame misanthrope Friday #12

Which publisher told you that? ificandream Sunday #17

I called him Jake Hacker long before... lame54 Friday #7

So did Trump. Coincidence, maybe? ificandream Friday #10

From the descriptions of the book, where I have a problem is that it karynnj Friday #11

Post removed Post removed Saturday #13

If anything, I think some of these discussions are more ageism than anything else ificandream Sunday #18

Yes, there is something clearly wrong with Trump, yet Tapper is writing about Biden. SunSeeker Sunday #14

Lol SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #15

Tapper is all about Tapper Patton French Sunday #16