Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(195,406 posts)
2. No explanation
Thu May 22, 2025, 09:30 AM
May 2025

A key factor in the outcome was that conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who would have been the deciding vote, did not participate in the case. She did not explain why, but it is likely because of her ties with Notre Dame Law School. The law school's religious liberty clinic represents the charter school.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-sidesteps-major-ruling-religious-public-charter-schools-rcna204111

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

With justice Barrett recusal court [View all] Prairie_Seagull May 2025 OP
I'm pleasantly surprised that she recused. Scrivener7 May 2025 #1
No explanation underpants May 2025 #2
Publicly funded religious school in the United States BOSSHOG May 2025 #3
Who was the fourth vote? UpInArms May 2025 #4
I heard point made that this 'ruling' Prairie_Seagull May 2025 #5
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»With justice Barrett recu...»Reply #2