Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ecstatic

(34,860 posts)

14. Not necessarily.

Reply to W_HAMILTON (Reply #13)

Mon May 19, 2025, 05:37 PM

May 19

In 2022, hell, even in 2024, the concern was that there was still too much sexism. However, the timing of Biden stepping down in July 2024 made VP Harris the only unifying option available.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

To all who spoke poorly about Joe Biden over the years. [View all] usonian May 18 OP

Oh...my...gawd! Iggo May 18 #1

Jesus Christ mr715 May 18 #2

Seriously? mountain grammy May 18 #3

Life is black & white for some. Nt Fiendish Thingy May 18 #4

What the fuck? Initech May 18 #5

You talking to me? Fiendish Thingy May 18 #6

Except in this case... W_HAMILTON May 18 #7

I'm not talking about voting Fiendish Thingy May 19 #8

You think those that found every single little thing to criticize Biden about didn't impact voters? W_HAMILTON May 19 #9

Things could have been quite different Fiendish Thingy May 19 #11

Biden could have announced he wasn't going to run and Kamala would still have been our nominee. W_HAMILTON May 19 #13

Not necessarily. ecstatic May 19 #14

A lot of people discussed the negatives of his age and so on, without usonian May 19 #15

yikes! ecstatic May 19 #10

Judging from the responses... W_HAMILTON May 19 #12