General Discussion

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)

2. This has nothing to do with Biden, but most likely the physician who didn't monitor the Presidents PSA

Sun May 18, 2025, 09:21 PM

May 2025

because of the asinine recommendation not to check PSAs on people older than 70.

By the time a nodule is felt, or a gleason grade hits 9, the PSA is probably very high, and if they had been regularly monitoring it, it would have probably been caught much earlier.

Someone really needs to answer some questions, and it isn't President Biden, but his doctors.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

10 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

DET dflprincess SheltieLover greatauntoftriplets mahina vanessa_ca wackadoo wabbit xmas74 emulatorloo happy feet

54 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'This is odd': Yale doctor flags 'inconceivable' part of Joe Biden's cancer news [View all] JohnSJ May 2025 OP

Last I checked, Biden doesn't lie about his health. nt BootinUp May 2025 #1

This has nothing to do with Biden, but most likely the physician who didn't monitor the Presidents PSA JohnSJ May 2025 #2

What is the reason for this recommendation? LisaL May 2025 #3

It is based on faulty assumptions made 30+ years ago that have to do with life expectancy, and the false JohnSJ May 2025 #7

To save money basically... but it doesn't in the end Meowmee May 2025 #11

what is the reasoning for that? dsc May 2025 #4

US males have a life expectancy of about 79 ITAL May 2025 #5

Unless it's metastasized to other structures, like skeletal system. Colon, bladder and prostate cancers, fortunately ... marble falls May 2025 #8

Well sure ITAL May 2025 #12

Not all prostate cancers are slow moving Meowmee May 2025 #18

I said on average ITAL May 2025 #22

On average is not a valid way to determine testing and treatment 😁 Meowmee May 2025 #23

Well, they definitely take that sort of thing into consideration ITAL May 2025 #25

Yes the people who want to control monetary costs do that Meowmee May 2025 #26

I mean it's monetary costs, sure ITAL May 2025 #29

Wrong... only a bad doctor would not test someone with suspected cancer whatever their age 😁 Meowmee May 2025 #30

Talking about different things here ITAL May 2025 #32

Please read about it 😁 Meowmee May 2025 #34

It is based on faulty reasoning in place over 30+ years ago, and ignores the significant technological JohnSJ May 2025 #9

Some doctors are trying to do a similar thing for women now also Meowmee May 2025 #17

It's hard to believe a physician attending the President of the US wouldn't do a routine PSA when the other Liberal In Texas May 2025 #14

In some cases the psa does not go up significantly Meowmee May 2025 #21

Dr. Gupta on MSNBC said he probably has had this for about 2 years. Liberal In Texas May 2025 #47

No it is not unbelievable Meowmee May 2025 #50

How did you check Renew Deal May 2025 #38

The public record. nt BootinUp May 2025 #39

My thought, too. I'm not casting aspersion: my fight with multiple cancer surgeries has taught me I don't know ... marble falls May 2025 #6

One would think, unless they were following that stupid "recommendation", no need to test for someone JohnSJ May 2025 #10

I'm doing well, thanks, man. They found my colon cancer three years after a Proctologist told me I was clear ... marble falls May 2025 #15

Wow, your primary care was really on top of things. If you are in VA, you earned it through you service JohnSJ May 2025 #33

John, I've had "cadillac" insurance. VA tops any of it. In 12 years, I've only had two primary care physicians ... marble falls May 2025 #42

I'm 77 and I get a PSA test every 6 months. gab13by13 May 2025 #13

I get it! marble falls May 2025 #16

It is a simple test, and can save lives. JohnSJ May 2025 #35

Some things are private, even if you've been a president. babylonsister May 2025 #19

An Important Note DET May 2025 #20

Odd, but not impossible... LudwigPastorius May 2025 #24

Good to know. I turn 70 in October. rickyhall May 2025 #27

Good to know. I turn 70 in October. rickyhall May 2025 #28

JFC--now Joe Biden has to defend against "hiding" his cancer? crimycarny May 2025 #31

No one is accusing HIM of covering up. The problem is that his physician is probably using the outdated JohnSJ May 2025 #36

Yes, they are crimycarny May 2025 #37

Biden's communication staff announced it. They actually announced they felt a lump with a DRE. JohnSJ May 2025 #40

There's a similar blood test for women and ovarian cancer Sugarcoated May 2025 #41

I believe you are referring the protein CA-125, but I believe its use is mostly for monitoring how treatment is going. JohnSJ May 2025 #43

It can be used as a diagnostic tool to supplement other findings... Princess Turandot May 2025 #44

Thanks JohnSJ May 2025 #48

Well....his doctor should be defending how a president is not checked early enough to catch it. Melon May 2025 #46

When it comes to (any) cancer blunt truth is required DUU May 2025 #52

Welcome to DU! Delphinus May 2025 #53

Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote May 2025 #54

This message was self-deleted by its author Melon May 2025 #45

My Guess Is Deep State Witch May 2025 #49

My Dad was diagnosed in 1996. He survived, and quite well, until 2023... BurnDoubt May 2025 #51