Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Clinton Calls Out Debate Moderators For Ignoring Women’s Health [View all]revbones
(3,660 posts)42. Ah.  Makes sense.
        That is a bit different from what I had suggested.  
I had suggested that in order to stem the tide of overzealous alerts, that if a majority didn't back up the alert that you got a time out from the site for 24hours for the first failed alert. And then increase the time-out period based on the number of failed alerts in a specified time period like 30-90 days.  
My assumption was that something like that would make people think twice before they alerted, and cool off the number of questionable ones.  
Anyway, thanks again.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							54 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        This is a feminist group. We don't consider politicians actually discussing our issues to be
        JTFrog
        Apr 2016
        #3
      
        
        No your other commentary.  You know....she must be pandering since no one else is willing to bring
        JTFrog
        Apr 2016
        #5
      
        
        No I don't think someone actually bringing up women's issues is fucking pandering.
        JTFrog
        Apr 2016
        #7
      
        
        How is being fucking PISSED about women's issues not having a place in the debate UNNECESSARY?
        JTFrog
        Apr 2016
        #13
      
        
        If you call it pandering, you are absolutely saying something negative about women's issues.
        JTFrog
        Apr 2016
        #20
      
        
        Again I think you're more concerned over a slight to Hillary rather than fact.
        revbones
        Apr 2016
        #21
      
        
        "This is a safe haven group, for likeminded members. If people don't like it here, they have the,
        JTFrog
        Apr 2016
        #24
      
        
        How on earth do you not see that calling attention to women's issues "cheap and pandering" is
        JTFrog
        Apr 2016
        #30
      
        
        I wasn't referring to you specifically, but more toward women's rights in general.
        revbones
        Apr 2016
        #36
      
        
        Your bias compels you to pretend she panders while Sanders, doing precisely the same thing,
        LanternWaste
        Apr 2016
        #54
      
        
        I highly doubt she would admit her willingness to compromise on the right to choose.
        thereismore
        Apr 2016
        #28