Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
History of Feminism
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why patriarchy fears the scissors: for women, short hair is a political statement [View all]
Last edited Tue Jan 28, 2014, 04:11 PM - Edit history (1)
Written in response to a writer who goes by "Tuthmosis" who wrote a piece entitled "Girls With Short Hair are Damaged"
Why patriarchy fears the scissors: for women, short hair is a political statement
(excerpt)
He writes that long hair is almost universally attractive to men, when theyre actually speaking honestly. . . Women instinctively know this, which is why every American girl who cuts, and keeps, her hair short often does it for ulterior reasons . . . Short hair is a political statement. And, invariably, a girl who has gone through with a short cut  and is pleased with the changes in her reception  is damaged in some significant way. Short hair is a near-guarantee that a girl will be more abrasive, more masculine, and more deranged.
The essential argument is: men like long hair, and what sane woman would ever want to do anything that decreases her capacity to please men?
The advantage of articles like this, pantomimic though they be, is that they make misogyny legible. There was a time when feminists had to do that all by ourselves, but now we don't have to point out the underlying assumptions of a lot of the bullshit we deal with every day, because there are people on the internet doing it for us.
So Im almost grateful to Tuthmosis for writing this particular piece of recreational sexist linkbait. I thought I'd never have an even passably good reason to write about how little things like short hair change the way patriarchy responds to you.
(excerpt)
He writes that long hair is almost universally attractive to men, when theyre actually speaking honestly. . . Women instinctively know this, which is why every American girl who cuts, and keeps, her hair short often does it for ulterior reasons . . . Short hair is a political statement. And, invariably, a girl who has gone through with a short cut  and is pleased with the changes in her reception  is damaged in some significant way. Short hair is a near-guarantee that a girl will be more abrasive, more masculine, and more deranged.
The essential argument is: men like long hair, and what sane woman would ever want to do anything that decreases her capacity to please men?
The advantage of articles like this, pantomimic though they be, is that they make misogyny legible. There was a time when feminists had to do that all by ourselves, but now we don't have to point out the underlying assumptions of a lot of the bullshit we deal with every day, because there are people on the internet doing it for us.
So Im almost grateful to Tuthmosis for writing this particular piece of recreational sexist linkbait. I thought I'd never have an even passably good reason to write about how little things like short hair change the way patriarchy responds to you.
I thought her response was fantastic... wish I could quote more here. Much more at link...
Link: http://www.newstatesman.com/laurie-penny/2014/01/why-patriarchy-fears-scissors-women-short-hair-political-statement
I have had very short hair and very long hair... men have told me I should grow it when it was short, but never that I should cut it when it is long. I can say that when I grew it long, it was sometimes because I cared more about how I appeared to men... and sometimes because I was too lazy or busy to bother going for a haircut. When it was short, I didn't do it to make a statement, so much as for convenience, and at the same time, because I decided I just didn't really care about using my hair to attract men. The men I have met who care that much about hair are usually kind of shallow and sexist anyway.
						
							14 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
                    
					
                        Why patriarchy fears the scissors: for women, short hair is a political statement [View all]
							MadrasT
							Jan 2014
							OP
                        
        
        "what sane woman would ever want to do anything that decreases her capacity to please men?"
        redqueen
        Jan 2014
        #5
      
        
        I have had both very long and, very short hair in my day. Some men liked it long and, other
        Tuesday Afternoon
        Jan 2014
        #6
      
        
        I can believe it. We've been losing ground for the past two or three decades now.
        redqueen
        Jan 2014
        #8
      
        
        ugh. redqueen. I swear. I can believe it and I can't believe it. We have indeed been going backwards
        Tuesday Afternoon
        Jan 2014
        #9
      
  