Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: A plea to ignore the flame bait [View all]BainsBane
(57,040 posts)3. That's your choice
        but you know it makes no difference what you say.  Law abiding people know that those laws exist for a reason.  People that have issues with them have problems far beyond anything you can address, and they don't care what you say.
Anyway, I see those OPs as being purposefully started to eat up people's energies in discussions that go no where.  I am choosing not to participate further and sharing my views about them for others to consider or dismiss, as they see fit.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							48 replies
							
								
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                    
        
        i did ignore the flamefest of the OP.  BUT, i am not going ot be quiet when a poster says sexual
        seabeyond
        Dec 2013
        #1
      
        
        yes.  many alerts were flying on that thread.  i got pms...  i alerted on none, yet,
        seabeyond
        Dec 2013
        #11
      
        
        but again.  they thru up the picture from 40's.  3 or 4 others came in and made the point.  it is
        seabeyond
        Dec 2013
        #20
      
        
        is pretty in the face obvious. dontcha think? i do. i think it was all well spelled out thruout. nt
        seabeyond
        Dec 2013
        #31
      
        
        it would be very ineresting to see some demograhics and information compiled from
        Tuesday Afternoon
        Dec 2013
        #15
      
        
        yes, but the site administrators appear to be comfortable with those standards
        BainsBane
        Dec 2013
        #27
      
        
        a second welcome.  and yes.  that one effect my thinking process.  i saw a psa yesterday and
        seabeyond
        Dec 2013
        #32
      
        
        WE talk about the problems with it.  they cannot answer that.  will not answer.  because then it is
        seabeyond
        Dec 2013
        #44
      
        
        I see what you mean, but it's hard to let some of these statements pass.  Would it be
        Squinch
        Dec 2013
        #30
      
        
        There are more than one that I can't stand. We do have an MRA fundamentalist kaffee klatsch here.
        Squinch
        Dec 2013
        #35