Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience

(49,533 posts)

11. Yes, precisely.

Wed Jan 4, 2012, 02:58 PM

Jan 2012

You could do every study in the world showing it's crap, spend billions of dollars doing so, and you won't convince a single disciple.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

$1.4 BILLION spent on woo-woo research: Your tax dollars at work. [View all] Boston_Chemist Dec 2011 OP

The real tragedy here... laconicsax Dec 2011 #1

$666000 to see if prayer can cure AIDS. Boston_Chemist Dec 2011 #2

Interesting that the prayer study resulted in a 666 FiveGoodMen Jan 2012 #12

Yes, precisely. trotsky Jan 2012 #11

It would be amusing under other circumstances EvolveOrConvolve Dec 2011 #3

NCCAM is responsible for less than one-half of 1% of the NIH budget. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #4

Can you please source your numbers? HuckleB Dec 2011 #6

The OP article. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #7

One cannot prove a negative. HuckleB Dec 2011 #8

Of course one can. It depends on the negative being expressed. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #9

I dunno - all these studies have been great ammo against woo woo Taverner Jan 2012 #10