Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
2. The research is by neurologists, not electrical engineers
Wed May 7, 2014, 10:03 PM
May 2014

I have looked at a few of the papers available for public review, and the one thing that stands out for me is that they all seem to agree without further examination that electrodes placed at various spots on the forehead will result in a current path downward through the skin layer, skull, cerebrospinal fluid, dura, into and across the targeted brain area and back up through skull and scalp to complete the circuit. Anyone who is familiar with Ohm's Law can tell you that current will take the path of least resistance, which in this case would be across the scalp between the leads. Bone is not generally a good electrical conductor unless driven by very high voltage (see: Old Sparky). While some current can travel through higher resistances in a parallel circuit, the amount in this case would be exceedingly tiny, likely in the nano-Amps.

It is conceivable to me that such units using electromagnetic fields, rather than current, may have some effectiveness. And in fact, such technology also exists. The tDCS unit described in the latest Wired column uses just a 9V battery and a voltage regulator configured as a current regulator. It simply isn't within reason for anyone with an electronics education to believe the claims that it will perform as advertised.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»transcranial direct curre...»Reply #2