Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,303 posts)
2. The work that defines my current field was done by old men.
Mon May 19, 2025, 10:06 PM
May 19

John Fenn, the discoverer of electrospray ionization (ESI), the key element in modern mass spectrometry, did his Nobel Prize winning work in his 60's, at the end of his career. He was semi-retired, a forced retirement. His work was based on the understanding of the "Taylor Cone" a paper published by Geoffrey Taylor when he was 78 in 1964.

Fenn's work on ESI took place after he had reached mandatory retirement ,(70) age at Yale. (He and Yale spent years suing each other over the rights to the ESI patent. Fenn lost the lawsuit.)

He was 85 when he was awarded the prize.

I think the myth that people can only produce great science when they are young, is that when young people do great science that rises to prominence, they can be distracted by their fame and find it hard to continue their work. Richard Feynman complained about being awarded the Nobel Prize without his consent, because it distracted him.

Obscurity can be a good thing for doing good work. Experience, and failure, are also benefits that can lead to good work.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Celebrating the Birth Cen...»Reply #2