Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,306 posts)
10. The first commercial nuclear reactor in the US was...
Fri Feb 28, 2025, 02:19 PM
Feb 2025

...essentially an aircraft carrier naval reactor, the reactor at Shippenport. Ground was broken (in a ceremony where President Eisenhower handled the shovel) in September 1954 and reached full power in December 1957. It shut down in 1982, as it was not at the scale of later reactors, a subject of some irony considering recent thinking. It is as of this time, the only commercial breeder reactor ever to have operated in the United States as it is the only thermal commercial reactor to have a fuel elements incorporating thorium.

The Wikipedia page for Shippenport has accurate information.

I have long advocated the incorporation of thorium in heavy water reactors to enable them to breed plutonium and neptunium from "once through" uranium recovered from used nuclear fuel. The destruction of long friendly relations with our neighbor to the North by the orange buffoon has added an additional barrier to this idea.

We were, before the disastrous effort of the orange buffoon - ventriloquist's dummy for his Maggotcy King Eloon - to destroy American science, well into an age of nuclear creativity not seen in this country since the 1960's. The former director of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, the late great Alvin Weinberg wrote a book on the topic of nuclear creativity in the 1950s and 1960s, "The First Nuclear Era."

He would have been thrilled to see the late 2010s and early 2020s, given the enormous creativity observed with advances in materials science and computational power. It represented a third nuclear era. It is probably the case that the modern aircraft carrier powerplants could function as commercial plants but they are still limited by being machines for producing mere electricity. In an era of extreme global heating, we definitely need to do more than that with nuclear heat. There are many outstanding designs with broader applicability nearing commercial use.

As for the destruction of Michigan forest for solar junk which will have an an average continous power load of a large high school's diesel generator, given the poor capacity utilization of solar, and as it will require fossil fueled backup every night and every time it snows heavily in Michigan, well yes, it's disgusting. Regrettably this sort of awful enterprise remains popular, stupid, but popular.

Thanks for your comment.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As it's so dire, it's not amusing to see an antinuke quoting the two most pronuclear climate scientists in the world. NNadir Feb 2025 #1
I'm not "antinuke." OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #2
In my position, I hear a lot from people who tell me they're not antinukes who nevertheless drag out every idiotic... NNadir Feb 2025 #3
Simple questions OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #4
Spoken like a true "I'm not an antinuke" antinuke. QED. One might ask how long it will take the useless solar.... NNadir Feb 2025 #5
Who are you arguing with? OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #6
To your point around destruction of wilderness Pull_Left Feb 2025 #9
The first commercial nuclear reactor in the US was... NNadir Feb 2025 #10
Really appreciate the detailed response Pull_Left Feb 2025 #13
Let's not pretend that solar farms can only be built in the wilderness OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #11
Absolutely agree! Pull_Left Feb 2025 #12
Wherever and whenever they are built they will represent an unconcionable waste.. NNadir Feb 2025 #14
None of this is relevant to the OP OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #17
I certainly am very familiar with Jim Hansen and Pushkar Kharecha's work. I must have linked their highly cited... NNadir Mar 2025 #18
I should know better OKIsItJustMe Mar 2025 #19
Great post! Thanks for posting. Jim__ Feb 2025 #7
You're welcome OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #8
We can of course consider whether an appreciation of science... NNadir Feb 2025 #15
I have worked with several scientists, some of them I call friends. OKIsItJustMe Feb 2025 #16
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»James Hansen and Pushker ...»Reply #10