Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiction

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Little Star

(17,055 posts)
Mon Sep 5, 2016, 10:01 AM Sep 2016

No, the internet has not killed the printed book. Most people still prefer them. [View all]

Even with Facebook, Netflix and other digital distractions increasingly vying for time, Americans’ appetite for reading books — the ones you actually hold in your hands — has not slowed in recent years, according to a study by the Pew Research Center.

Sixty-five percent of adults in the United States said they had read a printed book in the past year, the same percentage that said so in 2012. When you add in e-books and audiobooks, the number that said they had read a book in printed or electronic format in the past 12 months fell to 73 percent, compared with 74 percent in 2012.

Twenty-eight percent said they had opted for an e-book in the past year, while 14 percent said they had listened to an audiobook.

http://www.boston.com/news/books/2016/09/04/no-the-internet-has-not-killed-the-printed-book-most-people-still-prefer-them

Count me in the printed book category now that I am retired. I use to also like audiobooks when I had a long drive to work back in the day.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Me too shenmue Sep 2016 #1
You can share printed books, and that's half the fun ... Auggie Sep 2016 #2
Thanks for sharing that hermetic Sep 2016 #3
Oh, yes. PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2016 #4
How's this for irony? hermetic Sep 2016 #5
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Fiction»No, the internet has not ...»Reply #0