Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: US court: $1,000 tax on handguns unconstitutional [View all]mwrguy
(3,245 posts)23. OK, make it 100% then
        That's stood the test of time.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							46 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        The US does not adhere to the principle of Parliamentary sovereignty...
        discntnt_irny_srcsm
        Oct 2016
        #28
      
        
        The subject is the right wing falsehood contained in post #8. That's the post I was replying to.
        stone space
        Oct 2016
        #31
      
        
        If you support the tax then you support a thing that only Trump and his ilk could afford.
        Nuclear Unicorn
        Oct 2016
        #35
      
        
        Clyde Barrow got his BARs from National Guard armories. His favorite weapon as I recall, with...
        Marengo
        Oct 2016
        #13
      
        
        That, along with living out of cars, Bonnie's injury, and the loss of Buck took a heavy toll.
        Marengo
        Oct 2016
        #16
      
        
        According to John Neal Phillips, Barrow's goal in life was not to gain fame or fortune from robbing
        discntnt_irny_srcsm
        Oct 2016
        #17
      
        
        Ah...yes, Ed Crowder, I remember that now. Clyde certainly was determined never to return...
        Marengo
        Oct 2016
        #18
      
        
        Why do you think only people as rich as Trump should be allowed to own guns?
        Nuclear Unicorn
        Oct 2016
        #19
      
        
        I think that we can all agree that NRA candidate Trump should be stripped his gun Rites for life
        stone space
        Oct 2016
        #29
      
        
        Trump's shitheelness is no excuse for continued attempts at threadjacking
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2016
        #33
      
        
        Clumsy attempts to dodge the question aside, why do you support a regressive tax on a civil right?
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2016
        #36
      
        
        For that matter, what does a Trump campaign ad have to do with the OP?
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2016
        #37
      
        
        That bit of NRA propaganda has been reposted twice, once in an OP. Cui bono?
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2016
        #42
      
        
        Thought-terminating cliches aside, the Supreme Court disagrees with you. And so does the President.
        friendly_iconoclast
        Oct 2016
        #41
      
  