Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)NRA has right to lobby, Longmeadow has right to ignore it [View all]
The National Rifle Association has a right to campaign against proposed bylaws that will tighten gun controls in Longmeadow.
The town has a right to ignore the single-issue, deep-pocketed and politically charged national lobbying organization and take reasonable measures as it sees fit.
The word "reasonable" sticks in the craw of NRA members, some of whom haven't seen a gun control law yet that they'd consider reasonable. The organization's statement on the Longmeadow proposals declared them "unreasonable restrictions on law-abiding gun owners.''
The restrictions call for a $300 fine imposed on anyone possessing a firearm, rifle or shotgun in town-owned buildings or on recreation property. Gun owners would be required to provide the police department with descriptions (including the serial number, make, model, and caliber) of each firearm, rifle, or shotgun they own.
http://www.masslive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/04/nra_has_right_to_lobby_longmea.html
The town has a right to ignore the single-issue, deep-pocketed and politically charged national lobbying organization and take reasonable measures as it sees fit.
The word "reasonable" sticks in the craw of NRA members, some of whom haven't seen a gun control law yet that they'd consider reasonable. The organization's statement on the Longmeadow proposals declared them "unreasonable restrictions on law-abiding gun owners.''
The restrictions call for a $300 fine imposed on anyone possessing a firearm, rifle or shotgun in town-owned buildings or on recreation property. Gun owners would be required to provide the police department with descriptions (including the serial number, make, model, and caliber) of each firearm, rifle, or shotgun they own.
http://www.masslive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/04/nra_has_right_to_lobby_longmea.html
						
							28 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
                    
					
        
        I agree, not just one person. Especially when the NRA and its gun worshipping
        justhanginon
        Apr 2016
        #2
      
        
        Will you come back and discuss if this gets voted down at Town Meeting on 10 May?
        friendly_iconoclast
        Apr 2016
        #5
      
        
        Not a dime will be donated, and 'activism' will once again mean 'more wear on keyboards'
        friendly_iconoclast
        Apr 2016
        #6
      
        
        "Assault weapons did not exist when the framers of the Bill of Rights penned the 2nd Amendment"
        friendly_iconoclast
        Apr 2016
        #4
      
        
        UPDATE: "Longmeadow residents defeat controversial gun control initiatives in Town Meeting"
        friendly_iconoclast
        May 2016
        #13