Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun Control Fails: What Happened in England, Ireland, and Canada [View all]northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)7. I think you have a logical fallacy...
        Comparing 1967 UK to now? That has so many issues, from gun cost, availability (Poirot is not the only thing shipped from Belgium to the UK), ammo, gun types, media saturation...etc.
But way more importantly 1968 was not the start of their laws.
History of Firearms Law
Early Regulation
Early acts regulating the ownership of firearms were fairly limited. The Gun Licenses Act 1870 and the Pistols Act 1903 served primarily as Acts to generate revenue and required owners to hold a license from the post office. The system was described as generally ineffective.[4] In 1920, the Firearms Act[5] was passed, to stop firearms from being used by criminals and other evilly disposed or irresponsible persons.[6] While one aim of the restriction was to curb violent crime, it was believed that other reasons included concerns over uprisings in Russia spilling over into Britain, particularly with the end of World War I and the return of thousands of troops trained in the use of firearms and an increase in the number of such weapons in circulation.[7] This Act set out the basis for the licensing system of firearms that is still in operation today, providing the chief officer of police in the district the applicant lives with the authority to issue licenses. When enacting this legislation, the right to bear arms by citizens was considered; however, this was countered by the argument that such redress was adequately obtainable through the ballot box and by access to Parliament and the courts.[8] Further controls were introduced in 1937 to allow conditions to be attached to certificates and to place more stringent restrictions on particularly dangerous weapons such as machine guns.[9]
The laws were consolidated and amended in 1968 with the enactment of the Firearms Act, which is the legislation still used today.
Early Regulation
Early acts regulating the ownership of firearms were fairly limited. The Gun Licenses Act 1870 and the Pistols Act 1903 served primarily as Acts to generate revenue and required owners to hold a license from the post office. The system was described as generally ineffective.[4] In 1920, the Firearms Act[5] was passed, to stop firearms from being used by criminals and other evilly disposed or irresponsible persons.[6] While one aim of the restriction was to curb violent crime, it was believed that other reasons included concerns over uprisings in Russia spilling over into Britain, particularly with the end of World War I and the return of thousands of troops trained in the use of firearms and an increase in the number of such weapons in circulation.[7] This Act set out the basis for the licensing system of firearms that is still in operation today, providing the chief officer of police in the district the applicant lives with the authority to issue licenses. When enacting this legislation, the right to bear arms by citizens was considered; however, this was countered by the argument that such redress was adequately obtainable through the ballot box and by access to Parliament and the courts.[8] Further controls were introduced in 1937 to allow conditions to be attached to certificates and to place more stringent restrictions on particularly dangerous weapons such as machine guns.[9]
The laws were consolidated and amended in 1968 with the enactment of the Firearms Act, which is the legislation still used today.
https://www.loc.gov/law/help/firearms-control/greatbritain.php
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							65 replies
							
								
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                    
                        Gun Control Fails: What Happened in England, Ireland, and Canada [View all]
							discntnt_irny_srcsm
							Apr 2016
							OP
                        
        
        do you have anything better than a simplistic statement and a logical fallacy?
        gejohnston
        Apr 2016
        #35
      
        
        The areas of your country with supposed better gun control aren't getting them from Mexico.
        Bad Dog
        Apr 2016
        #39
      
        
        is there any thought to the fact that it would have been far worse without gun control
        MariaThinks
        Apr 2016
        #4