Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,671 posts)
3. The turd in the pool
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:27 AM
Feb 2016
"Given that the Second Amendment does not establish the right to keep and bear arms but, rather, presumes it, one could argue that the presumption is mistaken."

One could argue anything. I could argue rainwater is Scotch and send your ass a bill after the next storm. Are the odds good that I'll ever collect anything?

Since you posted this imaginary 'let's pretend the world is flat' idea, I infer that you agree with it. Can you explain why it may be reasonable to PRESUME that the Founder's assumption is wrong? The article kind of skips over that. The author, Barry Gan, also states that people give up rights to their government in return for a promise from the government to protect their rights.

WHERE, can it be found in the Constitution or Bill of Rights that individuals "give up" any rights?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The Fatally Flawed Second...»Reply #3