Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Universal Background Checks for firearms [View all]GGJohn
(9,951 posts)12. Well then, you should get right on it.
        Of course you realize that the American public isn't on your side, (or you don't realize it).
Let's see, you would need to convince the Congress to call for a Constitutional Convention, then convince 2/3rd's of the Congress to vote for a repeal or to amend the 2A, then, if by some miracle, you did manage to get that, then it would be presented to the states for ratification, of which you will need 3/4th's to ratify it.
Do you understand what I'm saying here?
It would take only 13 states to deep six any change to the BoR.
Think you've got the votes?
Here are a list of 13 states who would vote no:
Arizona (My state)
Alabama
Colorado
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
Oregon
There are many, many more that would vote no.
Hey, but if that's the way you roll, good luck.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							50 replies
							
								
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                    
        
        Giving Gun Worshipers another Amendment to further Sanctify their Religion is not an step forward.
        stone space
        Oct 2015
        #3
      
        
        Sounds like my experience with describing Chicago gun laws as Jim (large, raucous black bird).
        Eleanors38
        Oct 2015
        #32
      
        
        This is a reasonable proposal for this gun owner...Controllers?  Not so much.
        Eleanors38
        Oct 2015
        #27
      
        
        I am skeptical because much of the rhetoric here and elsewhere is characterized...
        Eleanors38
        Oct 2015
        #49
      
        
        "...believe drugs should be illegal?"  From The Anti-Ammosexual Handbook of Reality?
        Eleanors38
        Oct 2015
        #33