Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Languages and Linguistics

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Lionel Mandrake

(4,173 posts)
Thu Aug 15, 2019, 05:08 PM Aug 2019

the persistence of syntax [View all]

Syntax seems to change more slowly than semantics. For example, modals in English have had about the same syntax for hundreds of years, but what used to be their preterites now have present-tense meanings. The obsolete verb 'mote' meant "must" during (and before) the Early Modern period, and its formerly-preterite form 'must' is all that remains of it. The other modals come in pairs (may/might, can/could, etc.) such that the formerly-preterite forms are often called subjunctive nowadays.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
the persistence of syntax [View all] Lionel Mandrake Aug 2019 OP
It's intesting to look at syntax of other languages I know geardaddy Aug 2019 #1
Hmmm ... Igel Aug 2019 #2
I'm a dinosaur. Lionel Mandrake Aug 2019 #3
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Languages and Linguistics»the persistence of syntax»Reply #0