Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lionel Mandrake

(4,169 posts)
11. Interesting.
Thu Nov 13, 2014, 02:05 PM
Nov 2014

My dictionary says:

morphophonology
noun
the branch of linguistics that deals with the phonological representation of morphemes.
which seems to cover my topic and a lot more.

I often say "would-uhv", "should-uhv", or "could-uhv" before consonants as well as vowels, but when I am careless the "v" sound is not very loud, i.e., what I say before a consonant is close to "would-uh", "should-uh", or "could-uh".

A common mistake in writing is to replace "have" with "of", e.g., "should of gone". This mistake reflects the pronunciation of "have" in context.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pronunciation of articles in English [View all] Lionel Mandrake Nov 2014 OP
What the ____? CurtEastPoint Nov 2014 #1
Verily I say unto thee ... Lionel Mandrake Nov 2014 #5
My speech prefers schwa before everything but a stressed vowel. Igel Nov 2014 #8
Interesting but cryptic, as always. Lionel Mandrake Nov 2014 #9
The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind. Scuba Nov 2014 #2
Heathcliff! Heathcliff! n/t Lionel Mandrake Nov 2014 #3
I don't get the reference. Please help. Scuba Nov 2014 #4
Heathcliff is a character Lionel Mandrake Nov 2014 #6
OK, but what's that got to do with "thu" and "thee"? Scuba Nov 2014 #7
The technical term for this is morphophonology. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #10
Interesting. Lionel Mandrake Nov 2014 #11
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Languages and Linguistics»Pronunciation of articles...»Reply #11