Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mental Health Support

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts) Wed Jun 22, 2016, 08:10 AM Jun 2016

Skinner's response, the admin chooses to not clarify if MI is covered under new insensitivity rule [View all]

at this time.

The following is the text of the reply also available at ATA

"Our intent is that all forms bigoted intolerance should not be permitted.

We wrote the rule to be open-ended so people could apply it wherever there is bigotry on the site. If juries do not deal with bigotry against mentally ill people then we can re-write the rule to clarify."

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Skinner's response, the admin chooses to not clarify if MI is covered under new insensitivity rule [View all] HereSince1628 Jun 2016 OP

sheesh. mopinko Jun 2016 #1

Yes, I think this says that those who feel it is insensitive must alert on it HereSince1628 Jun 2016 #3

A further statement from Skinner, which is stronger, and my reply to that. HereSince1628 Jun 2016 #2

Thanks, HS. Tobin S. Jun 2016 #4

As you know this is a problem of society that is reflected by DU HereSince1628 Jun 2016 #5