Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

woodsprite

(12,475 posts)
8. When I first had a biopsy for what eventually turned out to be cancer,
Fri Jan 14, 2022, 11:53 AM
Jan 2022

The number/make up of the cells they found put me in a "suspicious" category. My GYN kept watch on me every 3 months to see if there were any changes, put me on some meds. About 2 years and procedures after that, I ended up having an ablation to take care of some bleeding issues. Eighteen months after the ablation, I had another biopsy because I was having problems again. That biopsy came back as endometrial adenocarcinoma Grade 1 and prompted my surgery (total hysterectomy). So it was about 5 yrs from my initial "suspicious" biopsy result to being diagnosed with early grade/stage cancer. There had always been a chance that the hormones he put me on would have resolved the issue, but that wasn't the case. I know several friends who have had suspicious cervical biopsies that resolved over a year or two and had only been monitored.

There may be suspicious cells, but as my Dr. told me, any biopsy is only as good as the speck of tissue removed. Apparently years ago, the volume of bad to good cells was very very low and only 1 sampling was done. Did they sample multiple spots with your husband's biopsy? That would be a good question to ask. My last biopsy in February (15 yrs after the original diagnosis/surgery), the interventive radiologist sampled 5 different places in and around the mass. I am currently finishing up a years worth of treatment - 4 rnds chemo, surgery, 2 rnds chemo, 25 rnds external rads (I'm almost halfway through this phase), then 3 rnds internal rads.

It's a shock to hear, or even think, that "C" word. It throws you for a loop. My oncologist and GYN both encouraged me to do my own research once I was diagnosed and discuss options with them.

I hope that the suspicious cells clear up for your husband. Sending positive thoughts to both of you!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Equivocal"-- sorry but that is not uncommon. It means the lab could not be confirm hlthe2b Jan 2022 #1
Depends on the grade. If it is a low grade, it is not unreasonable to do what is called Active JohnSJ Jan 2022 #2
My last colonoscopy had results like that-- viva la Jan 2022 #3
It was a urologist that did the biopsy (n/t) MissMillie Jan 2022 #18
He would have referred him to an oncologist viva la Jan 2022 #21
Bet a lot the dr. said pre-cancerous and all he heard was cancer, that happened to a friend. lark Jan 2022 #4
The 'watch and wait' is worthless imo dweller Jan 2022 #5
Active Surveillance is NOT worthless. If the gleason grade is a 3+3 and small volume, the next step JohnSJ Jan 2022 #10
I specifically opened my post with 'imo' dweller Jan 2022 #16
Of course. This is a forum for opinions, and if my response sounded abraisve that sure wasn't my JohnSJ Jan 2022 #17
His PSA was elevated MissMillie Jan 2022 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2022 #6
You are absolutely right Chin. In addition, a diagnosis of prostate cancer does not mean a death JohnSJ Jan 2022 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2022 #14
There can be what's called atypical cells which means they are not quite normal, but not as yet PortTack Jan 2022 #7
that sounds familiar MissMillie Jan 2022 #20
When I first had a biopsy for what eventually turned out to be cancer, woodsprite Jan 2022 #8
I believe the biopsy failed to show what the mri showed. It might look like CA on the scan mitch96 Jan 2022 #9
Very true, and hopefully they did what is referred to as a directed biopsy based on the JohnSJ Jan 2022 #15
It's been a while since I was in the medical field.. Fusion bx was just coming in when I mitch96 Jan 2022 #22
Get a copy of the medical records including test and biopsy results. 58Sunliner Jan 2022 #11
I strongly recommend the book "Invasion of the Prostate Snatchers", by Dr. Mark Scholz, to educate JohnSJ Jan 2022 #13
Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Cancer Support»Isn't a biopsy supposed t...»Reply #8