Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,972 posts)

31. (Sigh) The office contents, obviously

Mon Mar 2, 2015, 01:45 AM

Mar 2015

... which not a single real expert finds surprising, and steel "glowing bright yellow and orange" simply confirms that temperature rather than refutes it. Where is the evidence of any temperature anywhere near the temperature of thermite, and where is the rational explanation of how thermite would be found burning "weeks after" or why steel melted by thermite before the collapse would still be "molten" weeks later? The thermite theory isn't just unsupported; it's downright irrational.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

LOL, YouTube gets it [View all] William Seger Mar 2015 OP

Youtube is owned by google jakeXT Mar 2015 #1

This new policy is going to put a dent in Gage's Vacation Fund (n/t) William Seger Mar 2015 #3

How so? wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #15

apparently you didn't. wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #2

Apparently I didn't what? William Seger Mar 2015 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #5

LOL William Seger Mar 2015 #6

i did leave it off and substituted www. instead... wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #7

LOL, "finally being correct" huh? William Seger Mar 2015 #8

but i do usually wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #9

That's okay William Seger Mar 2015 #10

Good thing that! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #11

Hard to say William Seger Mar 2015 #13

I think there is quite a few more than 3 or 4 and...just because they disagree with the wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #14

I ANSWER people who "question the official nonsense" William Seger Mar 2015 #16

molten steel and free fall acceleration! n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #17

See edit above William Seger Mar 2015 #18

pssst! that video you originally posted about is here: wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #20

fema admits molten steel. Many eyewitnesses identified it! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #19

Instead of retracting your lie, you offer another one William Seger Mar 2015 #21

bullshit! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #22

There's no need to explain things that didn't happen William Seger Mar 2015 #23

fail! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #24

Dishonest arguments and recycled bullshit William Seger Mar 2015 #25

you're projecting! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #28

that would be over 1800 degrees F! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #26

Which is precisely the temperatures reached by the rubble pile fires William Seger Mar 2015 #27

what fueled those rubble piles william? wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #29

(Sigh) The office contents, obviously William Seger Mar 2015 #31

evaporated steel shows thermit evidence! n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #32

No, it does not William Seger Mar 2015 #35

nope! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #36

"Truther" physicists, chemists, and metallurgists William Seger Mar 2015 #39

truther simply means they seek the truth! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #41

No, it does not; that's why I ALWAYS put "truther" in quotes William Seger Mar 2015 #42

doesn't matter what you think it means! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #44

You "want the truth" but William Seger Mar 2015 #46

I don't accept that you wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #47

there is not any evidence that the temps wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #30

(A) Yes, there is evidence, and... William Seger Mar 2015 #33

molten steel and free fall acceleration! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #34

My credibility is irrelevant William Seger Mar 2015 #37

those "experts" are lying to you! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #38

And 99.99% of their professional peers ignore them William Seger Mar 2015 #40

means nothing! wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #43

It means they can't make a case William Seger Mar 2015 #45

This message was self-deleted by its author wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #12