Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

superbeachnut

(381 posts)
8. The Vd definition is made up - why fake a definition to support a lie
Thu Jun 26, 2014, 03:00 PM
Jun 2014

You use made up definitions to support your lie of impossible speed.

That is not the definition of Vd, your journalist made it up. It is what you quote mined. There is nothing you can do to make a fake Vd definition become the real thing, you failed. Like your fake Vg diagram, and 11.2g, a long list of failure done to spread the lies of impossible speed.
http://www.cesura17.net/~will/ephemera/sept11/balsamo/balsamo2.html (no expertise in physics at pilots for truth)
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=188863 (fake Vg diagram shows no expertise in aero at pilots for truth)
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/easyjet-737-incident-debunks-pilot-for-9-11-truth-v-g-diagram-video.3160/page-7

It is funny, at pilots for truth forum, they prohibit linking to web sites, so the lies pilots for truth present are not exposed.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=18336
You failed to debunk, and expose you have no idea what physics is. You do nothing to refute the fact your claims are lies; pilots for truth come up with 34g for 2.4g problem, and they can't get it right after years.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

William Seger - Epic Fail [View all] johndoeX Jun 2014 OP
Who is Helen Borg Jun 2014 #1
Leslie? delphi72 Jun 2014 #2
Fringe pilot group fails to define Vd, uses googled journalist made up definition superbeachnut Jun 2014 #3
With conspiracy hucksters and frauds ... William Seger Jun 2014 #4
The "Defined Limit Load" johndoeX Jun 2014 #5
Fraud! William Seger Jun 2014 #10
Third time asked Seger, johndoeX Jun 2014 #12
Another feeble attempt at deception William Seger Jun 2014 #14
So, just to be clear... johndoeX Jun 2014 #15
WTF?!?! William Seger Jun 2014 #17
"Flying at Vd puts loads on the airframe" johndoeX Jun 2014 #18
For probably not the last time... William Seger Jun 2014 #20
Ok... now we are getting somewhere.... johndoeX Jun 2014 #21
"Getting somewhere," huh William Seger Jun 2014 #24
Nobody knows? johndoeX Jun 2014 #25
ROFLMAO. There's that bizarre Balsamo "debating" technique again William Seger Jun 2014 #26
The test is based on FAR Part 25 johndoeX Jun 2014 #27
Un-freakin-believable William Seger Jun 2014 #28
Loads johndoeX Jun 2014 #29
ALL types of loads are covered by the definitions in 25.301(a) William Seger Jun 2014 #31
Ding ding ding! johndoeX Jun 2014 #32
"You lose!" shouted Cap'n Bob from the bottom of his smoldering crater William Seger Jun 2014 #33
The FAA johndoeX Jun 2014 #34
Impossible lie exposed, pilots for truth next Gish Gallop superbeachnut Jun 2014 #6
Just a "journalist"? johndoeX Jun 2014 #7
The Vd definition is made up - why fake a definition to support a lie superbeachnut Jun 2014 #8
Why Beachy why? johndoeX Jun 2014 #9
Grade school kids more experience than needed to debunk pilots for truth superbeachnut Jun 2014 #11
"A mathematician"? johndoeX Jun 2014 #13
Flew a desk quote mining lie, mirrors the fake Vd definition quote mining failure superbeachnut Jun 2014 #16
Beachy - where did you get the diagram in your above post? johndoeX Jun 2014 #19
attacking a person, does not make the data wrong - no matter what other topics the person got wrong superbeachnut Jun 2014 #22
So, you agree with Frank? johndoeX Jun 2014 #23
pilots for truth expose they lack the expertise to decode the FDR superbeachnut Jun 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»William Seger - Epic Fail»Reply #8