Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
9. The OP is a joke.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 08:54 PM
Mar 2016

Common sense developed in childhood should make that obvious.

There are many reasons why physics is different on different scales. The video I posted brought up that fact that critters (and structures) are proportionally weaker the larger they get. The forces involved on large objects can't be compared to the forces involved in those poorly designed experiments in the OP.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And There It Is - The Elites Lie To Us Again cantbeserious Mar 2016 #1
If an experiment doesn't agree with reality, it's wrong William Seger Mar 2016 #2
Jonathan Cole=engineer... wildbilln864 Mar 2016 #8
Jonathan Cole is a sewer engineer William Seger Mar 2016 #14
more non sense from an amateur wildbilln864 Mar 2016 #15
In other words, you have NO CLUE what Cole is claiming to prove William Seger Mar 2016 #16
nothing to admit! you're wrong. wildbilln864 Mar 2016 #17
Physics of scale: cpwm17 Mar 2016 #3
your post and wildbilln864 Mar 2016 #7
The OP is a joke. cpwm17 Mar 2016 #9
yea right! wildbilln864 Mar 2016 #10
The Vérinage demolitions in William Seger's post shows that the OP is B/S. cpwm17 Mar 2016 #11
thank you for your opinion. n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2016 #12
Your little critter there has an amazing ability to deny objective reality. cpwm17 Mar 2016 #13
Just a thought whitefordmd Mar 2016 #4
yea right! wildbilln864 Mar 2016 #6
Deniers gonna deny! wildbilln864 Mar 2016 #5
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»9/11 Experiments: The For...»Reply #9