Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

In reply to the discussion: implosion: [View all]

whitefordmd

(102 posts)
11. So let me see if I understand
Sun Dec 27, 2015, 08:37 PM
Dec 2015

When the planes hit some explosions were set off. Not clear why you need explosions if the plane impacted the towers, but we are deep into woo at the moment so I am going with it.

The perps had a backup plan to ignite thermite at major columns at some point if the towers failed to collapse from the impacts to ensure the towers collapsed. Not clear why the perps had to have the towers collapse either, but again I've got my woo boots on snugly so I assuming this was critical to the plot.

All of this was choreographed to make it appear as if no explosions or thermite were used, so ....... sorry but I've run out of rational thought.

please fill in the rest.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

implosion: [View all] wildbilln864 Dec 2015 OP
It's a lovely implosion video. Is there a point in sharing? nt whitefordmd Dec 2015 #1
Yup, and here is what a real controlled demolition sounds like: William Seger Dec 2015 #2
notice how... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #3
So the explosions were set off when the planes impacted and not at the time of collapse? Nt hack89 Dec 2015 #4
Yes, that's what he believes William Seger Dec 2015 #5
I could only guess but wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #6
But thermite does not produce "squibs" hack89 Dec 2015 #7
no I don't agree... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #9
Any idea how much thermite will burn in an hour? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #8
so what? wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #10
So let me see if I understand whitefordmd Dec 2015 #11
hmmm... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #12
"quick removal & disposal of evidence." whitefordmd Dec 2015 #13
so you didn't know... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #14
I don't believe that happend whitefordmd Dec 2015 #15
clues: wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #16
Am i supposed to believe 9 to 12 months is a whitefordmd Dec 2015 #17
Inquiry. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #18
don't know what kind of ignorant stupidity you're rambling on about but it wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #19
Thank you for completely answering my question. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #20
didn't notice a question amidst wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #21
Oh, you understood me perfectly the first time. AtheistCrusader Dec 2015 #22
don't be afraid..... wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #23
Post 18 contains the question. AtheistCrusader Jan 2016 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»implosion»Reply #11