Creative Speculation

ProfessorGAC

(73,933 posts)

33. You Do Realize That Physics Do Not Support Such Nonsense

Wed Dec 23, 2015, 11:36 AM

Dec 2015

Don't you.

A demolition grade explosive with sufficient brissance, velocity, and volume expansion will move a huge volume of air, very very fast.

You know what you call air moving very fast? SOUND!

Secondly, to do what you're proposing, the explosive used either has to be:
Extremely high volume expansion and near the speed of sound, or;
Extremely high shock output with a pressure wave FAR in excess of the speed of sound.

Either way, there would be a clear indication of all the dust and debris in the air all moving away at nearly the same time at a velocity that would preclude the air escapement due to the collapse, and would clearly precede the collapse itself.

And don't start with the super thermite thing. It would require MASSIVE amounts of it and the light would have visible through the windows of the building long before the collapse.

Science is not on your side.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Forensic engineer/university prof to run an open evaluation of the NIST WTC 7 collapse model [View all] JohnyCanuck Nov 2015 OP

thanks for posting. looking forward to it. Check this video... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #1

Sounds like the Prof is on top of things. JohnyCanuck Nov 2015 #2

k&r nationalize the fed Nov 2015 #3

I wonder how whitefordmd Nov 2015 #4

you are... wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #5

Thanks for the typo correction whitefordmd Nov 2015 #6

that depend upon wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #7

You're avoiding the issue.... whitefordmd Nov 2015 #11

No. They're not "my guys". wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #13

Look at the damned NIST report: dougolat Dec 2015 #28

"good enough" for what purpose? William Seger Dec 2015 #29

There you go again with that 'silent explosives' canard. dougolat Dec 2015 #30

The thermite hypothesis was invented by Steven Jones... William Seger Dec 2015 #32

To what NIST report are you referring? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #31

The study is already biased before it begins William Seger Nov 2015 #8

unike NIST wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #9

If the study shows that fire could have destroyed WTC7 William Seger Nov 2015 #10

I accept that now! wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #12

Very interesting William Seger Dec 2015 #14

nope! wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #16

Watch THIS video William Seger Dec 2015 #17

do you realize wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #18

And if they needed magical silent explosives to do that William Seger Dec 2015 #19

Silent demolitions? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #20

I doubt it would be silent but wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #22

Ok not silent, but concealed. whitefordmd Dec 2015 #24

the demos were not wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #25

I think I am getting it whitefordmd Dec 2015 #26

You Do Realize That Physics Do Not Support Such Nonsense ProfessorGAC Dec 2015 #33

well that's obvious bullshit! wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #34

Just curious whitefordmd Dec 2015 #15

NIST described some of the "fiddling" they did William Seger Dec 2015 #21

well that's more nonsense but wildbilln864 Dec 2015 #23

Why is that nonsense? whitefordmd Dec 2015 #27