Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,731 posts)

5. "Funny" how that works

Reply to dougolat (Reply #4)

Sat Nov 28, 2015, 04:59 AM

Nov 2015

"Truthers" will tear through the NIST reports accusing the authors of fabricating any evidence that supports the "official story" until they finally find that nugget of truth that "points to there being much more" that the lying bastards accidentally left in there. But for some reason, how it "points to" magical things like silent explosives and super-nanothermite paint chips is never made rationally coherent.

I sort of like the idea that if you're going to accuse scores of experts from government, academia, and private industry of covering up a mass murder, you need a pretty substantial case. If you've got something that "points to there being much more" than the bullshit that "truthers" have offered up so far, let's see it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Psychologist Chris Gruener, 9/11 Truth in Massachusetts on 9/11 Free Fall with Andy Steele [View all] nationalize the fed Nov 2015 OP

Can I slime Andrew Steele? William Seger Nov 2015 #1

Why not, you slime anyone that doesn't believe the Bush/Cheney lies nationalize the fed Nov 2015 #2

I slime "truth movement" hucksters like Steele and Gage William Seger Nov 2015 #3

Agreed! dougolat Nov 2015 #4

"Funny" how that works William Seger Nov 2015 #5