Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

wildbilln864

(13,382 posts)

4. it's his shtick I guess...

Reply to OBenario (Reply #3)

Fri Oct 30, 2015, 08:05 PM

Oct 2015

attack the messenger, call experts names and ridicule their experience & expertise and pretend he knows more than the actual witnesses that were there. Present specious sophistry and pretend it's fact. Or outright deny the evidence. For a decade now. Still hasn't convinced anyone though.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

World Trade Center 7 and the NIST Report [View all] wildbilln864 Oct 2015 OP

Another "truther" very impressed with his own inabilty to comprehend simple stuff William Seger Oct 2015 #1

William... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #2

When they're not able to answer to arguments... OBenario Oct 2015 #3

it's his shtick I guess... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #4

WTC7 controlled demolition arguments have been answered many times, years ago William Seger Oct 2015 #5

William Seger: OBenario Nov 2015 #6

What a pantload William Seger Nov 2015 #7