Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)5 Reasons Why Expanding Nuclear is a Terrible Idea [View all]

5 Reasons Why Expanding Nuclear is a Terrible Idea
FoodandWaterwatch.org | Natalie Balbuena, Mia DiFelice | Sep 19, 2025
Trump and some Democratic leaders are calling for expanding nuclear energy. But nuclear power is more dangerous and worse for the climate than solar and wind.
Concerns about nuclear energy have often revolved around devastating catastrophes abroad, like those at Chernobyl and Fukushima, and the domestic near-miss tragedy at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania. But fatal meltdowns aside, nuclear power is generally dangerous, dirty, expensive and it isnt even climate-friendly. From the uranium mine to the toxic waste pit, nuclear power puts our health, environment, and climate at risk.
While both of the recent Biden and Trump administrations have played the pro-nuclear card, the current Trump administration is going all-in.
Some of Trumps biggest Big Tech donors aim to make a fortune from expanding artificial intelligence (AI), which requires massive amounts of power for AI data centers. Given that, we should regulate energy demand, particularly within the tech sector, and build more renewables. Instead, Big Tech companies, including Meta (owner of Facebook) and Amazon, are investing in nuclear. At the same time, Trumps policies are giving the nuclear industry a big boost.
Trumps Big Ugly Bill rolled back tax credits for renewables while largely maintaining benefits for the nuclear industry. It also added a bonus incentive to cover newer, advanced nuclear technology. Recently, the Department of Energy (DOE) established a consortium to create partnerships between the government and U.S. nuclear companies. This will pave the way for the Trump administration to take stake in private corporations as part of its quest to build out nuclear...snip
1. Nuclear Energy Poses Radioactive Health Threats, from Uranium Mining to Power Plants
2. U.S. Officials STILL Lack a Safe Plan for Nuclear Waste
3. Nuclear Is Not a Climate Solution
4. Nuclear Energy Is Dependent on Precious Water Resources
5. Nuclear Energy Is Way More Expensive Than Renewables
More
https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/2025/09/19/5-reasons-why-expanding-nuclear-is-a-terrible-idea/

It's becoming more and more difficult to understand the difference between Dump's energy policy and the energy policy of some on this very site. Maybe there isn't any difference. Turns out some here are very much against Solar AND Wind. But remember that while 'Murikans fight and argue, China is building a green future RIGHT NOW and generally is considered the new leader for global sustainable energy for the future. But there's always a new war to fight, even though the last war 'Murikans actually won was 80 years and a few trillion dollars ago. LOL 80 years ago. Soon Washington, the District of Criminals will start trying to convince everyone that China is the New Enemy and must be bombed and invaded like the US has done to Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq and all the others. If you can't beat em, kill em! With any luck at all, I'll be an ex-pat soon.
Obama: 'We've Added Enough New Oil And Gas Pipeline To Encircle The Earth'
3/22/12: In Cushing, Okla., President Barack Obama touts his administration's record of a huge boom in the U.S. oil and gas industry, dismissing concerns about accelerating climate change.

6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Thanks for the climate denial perspective from the fossil fuel industry trying to rebrand itself as "hydrogen."
NNadir
Saturday
#1
Those who mistake transition phases for end states are sadly mistaken. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Saturday
#2
Photovoltaic cells were invented in the last 500 years. Same for gas turbines, steam turbines, water turbines
Bernardo de La Paz
Saturday
#4
Um, um, um, turbines, water wheels are not devices to produce primary energy. They are devices that destroy exergy.
NNadir
Yesterday
#6
Also, nuclear is capital intensive and has the longest lead times. Decommissioning is a problem.
Bernardo de La Paz
Saturday
#3