Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

getagrip_already

(17,781 posts)
4. As an macroeconomic risk factor, its not a bad model...
Sun Sep 1, 2024, 11:21 AM
Sep 2024

It estimates the total cost of losses in a particular area.

But how it is used is the problem.

If aid is distributed based on it, then that is a flawed use of data. Because a strict dollar loss estimate does not take enough factors into play.

People building mega mansion on beachfront property do not represent the same human risk as a trailor park.

But the political clout of hilton head and galvonston are far higher than rural homes and businesses. Even house reps from red rural districts vote for the rich interests over everyone else.

They see to it fema cant allocate money to poor communities over rich ones.

They simply wont allow it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»FEMA Flood Risk Index Bas...»Reply #4