Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MichiganVote

(21,086 posts)
10. Thanks for the discussion. But, despite what most people think
Thu Oct 18, 2012, 08:57 PM
Oct 2012

1. Parental consent is not required. It has been the practice in most states to have parent signature but in actuality, it is not required. States are increasingly formulating IEP's that do not require parent signature. Part of this is our very changing society. For example, for the kids in foster care, we used to have to track down the foster care worker, have them come to the meeting to act for the state..but with the wide variety of living situations that kids have nowadays, sometimes it is impossible. If a parent objects to an IEP, surely the district should do everything possible to work with the parent but the parent can ask for a new IEP or they can go to hearing--at their expense.

2. If a student arrives from out of state, in some states a new eval. is required if an eval. has not been done in the state in the past. If the state in which they arrive feels that they can match the services from a previous state, they are not required to do a new IEP. Having said that, most districts do have a new IEP anyway. If for no other reason than new goals and objectives are needed, especially among high school kids. Some school district offer various HS curriculum that a student could benefit from and then an IEP can be necessary even if their service continues to be the same-Resource Room, Self Contained etc.

3. In Michigan, lack of attendance would likely rule out ESY unless there were mitigating circumstances such as a significant illness or accident. Even then, it would probably depend on the district.

4. You bet, that gal is going to eat those words for a long time but hey, we're all mere mortals.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not quite. MichiganVote Oct 2012 #1
Sorry I disagree. proud2BlibKansan Oct 2012 #3
The fact that the woman included her cost concerns in an email does not support MichiganVote Oct 2012 #5
The district is represented sulphurdunn Oct 2012 #7
A district can be represented by any administrator they so choose. And... MichiganVote Oct 2012 #8
1. True sulphurdunn Oct 2012 #9
Thanks for the discussion. But, despite what most people think MichiganVote Oct 2012 #10
In my school district... Stargazer09 Oct 2012 #2
More than a decade ago, LWolf Oct 2012 #4
Yup. Same stupidity. MichiganVote Oct 2012 #6
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»SF Special ed teachers sa...»Reply #10