Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Open Source and Free Software

sir pball

(5,004 posts)

10. I'll give UEFI a teensy bit of credit for at least trying

Reply to Recursion (Reply #9)

Sat Mar 9, 2013, 02:39 PM

Mar 2013

It IS a damn sight more advanced than BIOS but it's pretty clear to me it's about controlling the user and the extra features are just a fringe benefit - else they could have just adopted OF

I'm assuming you've seen the Towers of Hanoi in OF, that blew my mind.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can anybody explain why people like UEFI? [View all] Recursion Mar 2013 OP

i don't know if i *like* uefi but as a mac user.. Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #1

Pre-Intel Macs' firmware utterly spanked UEFI sir pball Mar 2013 #11

It gets us past 1980 boot technology? Warren Stupidity Mar 2013 #2

What was lacking about 1980 boot technology? (nt) Recursion Mar 2013 #3

If you've ever dealt with bios code you wouldn't ask that question. Warren Stupidity Mar 2013 #4

I write Forth code, sometimes for boot sectors Recursion Mar 2013 #5

You write Forth, you must have used OpenFirmware. sir pball Mar 2013 #8

I love OF Recursion Mar 2013 #9

I'll give UEFI a teensy bit of credit for at least trying sir pball Mar 2013 #10

Damfino. hobbit709 Mar 2013 #6

I think we know why Microsoft likes it (nt) pokerfan Mar 2013 #7

UEFI and Secure Boot are not the same thing toddaa Mar 2013 #12

If it's in the UEFi then as far as I'm concerned it's part of it. hobbit709 Mar 2013 #13

Lenovo's implementation of UEFI is the problem toddaa Mar 2013 #14