Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wyoming

unblock

(55,454 posts)

2. I'm sure the plaintiffs would happily accept a trans man

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Tue May 13, 2025, 05:06 PM

May 13

If they're all about the birth certificate or dna or whatever, then whatever definition they think excludes trans women should include trans men.

So, would they be cool with a big, bearded trans man who is taking testosterone and acting very masculine and perhaps has already had bottom surgery, just because they were assigned-female-at-birth?

Somehow I rather suspect they hate all trans people and it really has nothing to do either with any definition of sex or gender.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

TommyT139 Walleye 2MuchNoise

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court Gives Sorority Women 30-Day Deadline In Lawsuit Over Wyoming Trans Member [View all] mahatmakanejeeves May 13 OP

They can't define "man" Walleye May 13 #1

Who, the judge? TommyT139 May 13 #3

Maga Walleye May 13 #4

I suspect there are quite a few words they can't define. 2MuchNoise May 13 #6

I guess we'll just give up on trying to tell them what emoluments are Walleye May 13 #7

LOL. Way too many syllables. 2MuchNoise May 13 #8

I'm sure the plaintiffs would happily accept a trans man unblock May 13 #2

True. And if they didn't hate trans people they would find some other vulnerable minority group to hate. Walleye May 13 #5