Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Montana

Showing Original Post only (View all)

RandySF

(83,627 posts)
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 12:51 AM Thursday

'Montana Plan' to prohibit corporate spending in politics green lit for signature gathering [View all]

A plan to prohibit corporations from spending money on political candidates or ballot issues, aptly named “The Montana Plan,” is moving forward with the signature-gathering process, though in a different form than initially proposed.

The Transparent Election Initiative originally put forward a ballot issue to make a change to the Montana Constitution, but both the state’s Attorney General and Supreme Court found the language violated a “single subject” rule that governs citizen initiatives.

Transparent Election Initiative leader Jeff Mangan, a former Montana Commissioner of Political Practices, said the group resubmitted the amendment with simplified language, but also submitted a similar measure for a statutory initiative, which would create a new law, rather than alter the Constitution.

In a press release on Wednesday, the Transparent Election Initiative announced the statutory version, dubbed I-194, had received a green light from the Secretary of State’s office to begin gathering the signatures needed to place the initiative on the November ballot.




https://dailymontanan.com/2026/03/11/montana-plan-to-prohibit-corporate-spending-in-politics-green-lit-for-signature-gathering/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Montana»'Montana Plan' to prohibi...»Reply #0