Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kansas

Showing Original Post only (View all)

RandySF

(87,035 posts)
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 02:13 PM Wednesday

Finalists for Kansas Supreme Court vacancy willing to stand for election if amendment passes [View all]

TOPEKA — Johnson County District Judge Robert Wonnell gave thought when applying for a vacancy on the Kansas Supreme Court to the proposed constitutional amendment that could transform the selection of justices serving on the state’s highest court.

He said no one should expect him to transform into a foot-stomping candidate eager to battle rivals with attack ads and make promises about the outcome of issues before the court.

“If I were selected to serve on the Supreme Court, and if the process were to change, I don’t know that I am capable or could become a political animal,” he said.

The amendment on the Aug. 4 ballot would erase the current merit-selection system in place since 1958. The process has relied on a nine-member Supreme Court Nominating Commission to interview applicants and submit a list of finalists to governors. The existing approach in Kansas requires Supreme Court justices to stand for retention after serving one year on the bench. If a majority of votes are cast to retain a justice, that individual remains for a term of six years.



https://kansasreflector.com/2026/06/03/finalists-for-kansas-supreme-court-vacancy-willing-to-stand-for-election-if-amendment-passes/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Kansas»Finalists for Kansas Supr...»Reply #0