Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,521 posts)
2. Devalues the word to call it terrorism. It is ugly disruptive hurtful interference
Sat Dec 19, 2020, 07:48 AM
Dec 2020

Could add more adjectives and nouns, but it is not terrorism. It steps on true victims of terrorism to call it "terrorism".

In person, it would be a "disturbing the peace" violation or possibly assault if anyone feared for life or limb. Online it might rise to psychological assault. There could be conspiracy involved.

Certainly hate crimes could be charged.

The software needs to provide more controls to hosts.

The Zoom company needs to be more proactive about blocking IP addresses. Yes, sophisticated bombers can shift IP addresses, but most "low-stakes" disruptors can't be bothered or haven't figured it out. There are other countermeasures the company could provide if they weren't lazy. The company needs to be called out and forced to step up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Georgia»Racist 'Zoombombers' Targ...»Reply #2