Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The DU Lounge

MarineCombatEngineer

(15,922 posts)

4. Yup.

Reply to Oeditpus Rex (Reply #3)

Sat Sep 6, 2025, 11:49 PM

Sep 6

Last edited Sun Sep 7, 2025, 12:32 AM - Edit history (1)

The '56 was definitely unique in it's fuel tank filler design, along with the others you described.
You just don't see that kind of uniqueness anymore what with the mass production these days.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ultralite001

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just a tech. ? for gearheads, [View all] MarineCombatEngineer Sep 6 OP

Raises hand (nt) amerikat Sep 6 #1

(Points at hand) MarineCombatEngineer Sep 6 #2

Drivers side rear tail light. amerikat Sep 7 #9

Drivers side read tail light . amerikat Sep 7 #10

Yupyup Oeditpus Rex Sep 6 #3

Yup. MarineCombatEngineer Sep 6 #4

The fuel neck on my '66 Bel Air wasn't nearly so cool Oeditpus Rex Sep 7 #13

Same way on my '72 Chevy Nova. LudwigPastorius Sep 7 #14

What if you had? Oeditpus Rex Sep 8 #15

Probably wouldn't meet modern crash standards MichMan Sep 7 #5

LOL, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 7 #6

I meant the fuel filler placement, not the entire car MichMan Sep 7 #7

Well, you are certainly right about that, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 7 #8

Since I pumped gas in the 1960's, I think I could find it... Wounded Bear Sep 7 #11

As did I, MarineCombatEngineer Sep 7 #12

They Aren't Service Stations Anymore ProfessorGAC Sep 8 #16