Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(39,656 posts)
6. When I was a kid, tatoos were considered pretty low-class.
Thu Mar 27, 2025, 06:54 PM
Mar 2025

The cliche was they were only worn by sailors, but as I grew up I saw they were common with soldiers and ... prisoners.

What all have in common is that all might die far from home among strangers who don't speak their language, and their corpses might well be dismembered or badly damaged. Tatoos helped identify shipwreck victims and dead prisoners, so that searchers could identify the corpses years later by asking questions like, "Did he have an eagle tatooed on his chest ?" Even in illiterate societies, they could get a description of the victim(s). I guess if you're planning to die of a meth overdose in some dark alley, tatoos make sense. Not so much for the rest of us.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Why do some "Old Farts" (...»Reply #6