Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Bernardo de La Paz

(57,573 posts)

3. Thanks, but I'm unlikely to read it unless I run across a persuasive argument for the agenda elsewhere

Reply to Passages (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 31, 2025, 10:19 AM

Mar 2025

I'm all for abundance.

I think robotics and AI and other tech will make it possible to pay everyone a basic income of say equivalent to lower middle class. Employment could be partial employment or mostly focused on human to human contact.

IF, if, if fundamental imbalances are corrected. The current wealth & income inequalities are historically unsustainable. Society will not work if 70% of the work force is unemployed, homeless and eating Soylent Green because that's all they can afford.

I just think that erasing patents and copyrights is not going to achieve abundance.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

wyn borkins

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Patents and the Abundance Agenda [View all] Passages Mar 2025 OP

How does it work if companies can't get profits from huge R&D and media investments? Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2025 #1

I'm not reading where they can't get profits. Fairness is the approach and it is Passages Mar 2025 #2

Thanks, but I'm unlikely to read it unless I run across a persuasive argument for the agenda elsewhere Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2025 #3

Baker is not advocating erasing patents and or copyrights. Passages Mar 2025 #4