Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
Showing Original Post only (View all)Risk and boldness, not politics as usual, are necessary to stop Trump. [View all]
https://signalpress.blogspot.com/2025/03/if-trump-is-existential-threat-to.htmlThere were voices, among younger, more aggressive Democrats, who exhibited an extensive knowledge of the Constitution, in providing a course of action for the Democratic party to take to end this charade, and prove they really believed Trump was an existential threat to democracy. Though we had narrow majorities in both houses, the ability existed to break the Senate filibuster, a huge obstacle to democratic action in a republic, and then amend the judiciary act to allow President Biden to appoint enough justices to the Supreme Court to over-ride the conservative majority, neutralize the pig-headed Roberts, and prevent the ridiculous immunity ruling they issued on Trump's behalf.
That would have been a bold move, but looking at where Trump is headed and what is happening, it was a necessary move. But Biden didn't want to give up the filibuster, on long standing tradition and principle. And in hindsight, a majority leader like Schumer wouldn't have gone along with doing it. They were right in claiming that Trump was an existential threat to American democracy, but they were wrong, dead wrong, in the manner that they chose to deal with that. I wonder if they really cared. They have the resources to protect their own interests and cover their rear. The rest of us are the ones who will suffer under this.
And that might explain why there wasn't a whole lot of enthusiastic support from voters in November of 2024. They might have seen Trump as a threat to democracy, but they didn't see Democrats as the best way to deal with it.
That would have been a bold move, but looking at where Trump is headed and what is happening, it was a necessary move. But Biden didn't want to give up the filibuster, on long standing tradition and principle. And in hindsight, a majority leader like Schumer wouldn't have gone along with doing it. They were right in claiming that Trump was an existential threat to American democracy, but they were wrong, dead wrong, in the manner that they chose to deal with that. I wonder if they really cared. They have the resources to protect their own interests and cover their rear. The rest of us are the ones who will suffer under this.
And that might explain why there wasn't a whole lot of enthusiastic support from voters in November of 2024. They might have seen Trump as a threat to democracy, but they didn't see Democrats as the best way to deal with it.
"The hard truth is that the Democratic party, in its current form, cannot lead the opposition that is required."
That's the evaluation of Ben Rhodes, a former deputy national security advisor under the Obama Administration, and a contributing editor to the New York Times. I've read some of his work before, and he's in a position to know, and be honest about it. Simple observation shows him to be correct. Our senate minority didn't have the stomach to do the right thing about the CR. How in the world are they going to confront the big stuff we know is coming?
That's the evaluation of Ben Rhodes, a former deputy national security advisor under the Obama Administration, and a contributing editor to the New York Times. I've read some of his work before, and he's in a position to know, and be honest about it. Simple observation shows him to be correct. Our senate minority didn't have the stomach to do the right thing about the CR. How in the world are they going to confront the big stuff we know is coming?
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Risk and boldness, not politics as usual, are necessary to stop Trump. [View all]
lees1975
Mar 2025
OP
That's why I agree with Rhodes' assessment that Democrats need more than they've got now to lead the opposition to Trump
lees1975
Mar 2025
#2
Not clear that letting the govt shut down WAS the "right thing", though the key point is
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2025
#4
I know. But they could have done more damage with the govt shutdown and also get to blame Dems for any economic problems
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2025
#6
"Congress has given it's approval to the trump/Musk rampage." Can you be more specific and provide a source for that?
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2025
#9
The CR that they passed when Schumer and eight other Democrats voted for cloture gave Trump and Musk
lees1975
Mar 2025
#10
I'm not sure that really shows that the CR OK'd the DOGE rampage on the govt, but
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2025
#11
That would have been 2020 to 2022 when we had control of House, Senate and White House.
lees1975
Mar 2025
#12
approval in what way though? It can't be everything, like eliminating departments, I assume
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2025
#14